788 字
4 分钟

Tarekcloud EPYC Purchase Experience: Super-Sized Specs, Super-Sized Headaches

The specs are very tempting, but stability is a real concern. This article only reflects my personal real-world experience.

How It Started#

On September 25, I bought a “super-sized” EPYC plan during Tarekcloud’s EPYC promotion. Judging from the specs and price, this machine was pretty much unbeatable at the same price point. But reality once again confirmed the old saying: when something is cheap, someone has to pay for it.

When the Problems Began#

From day one after activation, the problems started. The EPYC 7763 instance began experiencing random reboots, and then the reboot interval stabilized at once every 2–8 hours. After each reboot, it took 5–10 minutes for the machine to come back online.

For an entire week, the server was in a state of intermittent downtime, making it almost impossible to run any service reliably.

Ongoing Failures and Migration#

The issue persisted until October 3, when the provider decided to abandon that machine entirely and migrated the whole system and platform to another new machine, 7B13. So far, the fault has not reappeared.

Provider’s Response#

Tarekcloud’s explanation was:

The EPYC series belongs to a “resold on behalf of” lineup, different from their self-operated Gold series (which is self-purchased, self-tested, then listed). These resold machines are not fully tested before shipping and may have “mixed memory modules,” which can cause random reboots.

In other words, what they’re selling is someone else’s procured SR655, not hardware they purchased and tested themselves. But even so, their supposedly self-purchased-and-tested Gold series also suffered outages during this period.

Compensation Plan#

Tarekcloud’s compensation offer was:

  • Extend EPYC plan usage by 10 days, or
  • Upgrade monthly bandwidth by an extra 1T / 2T / 4T of traffic (choose one of the three).

On paper, it sounds reasonable. But considering I could barely use the machine normally from day one, this compensation is basically better than nothing, but not by much. It essentially just makes up for the ten lost days.

image-20251006102959842

Harsh Takeaways#

  • Quality control is lacking;
  • Although the admin responds very quickly in the Telegram group, all operational notices are only posted there. There are zero email notifications — everything is done on a whim.
  • They sent a Telegram notice at 10:46 saying they would shut down the machine for maintenance at 10:50.

Who can possibly react and migrate that fast?

image-20251006104645319

About the CPUs#

Although the provider called it an upgrade, switching from 7763 to 7B13 is in fact a downgrade from the user’s perspective. The following data is from CPUBenchMark.

Right now, the 7763 goes for around 5,600 CNY, while the 7B13 sells for about 3,699 CNY (data from any random Taobao store).

image-20251006101039381

image-20251006101053379

ItemAMD EPYC 7B13AMD EPYC 7763
CPU TypeServerServer
Base Clock2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost Clock (Turbo)Up to 3.5 GHzUp to 3.5 GHz
Physical Cores64 (128 threads)64 (128 threads)
CacheL3 256 MBL1 64 KB / L2 0.5 MB / L3 32 MB
TDP240 W280 W
Annual Running Cost$43.80$51.10
First Appeared in ChartsQ3 2021Q1 2021
Sample Size2255
CPU Value Score0.064.0
Single-Thread Performance (% diff)2534 (0.0 %)2518 (−0.6 %)
Multi-Thread / CPU Mark (% diff)78064 (−7.7 %)84591 (0.0 %)

image-20251006100816610

In short: 7B13 is slightly weaker in real-world performance, a bit more power efficient, and cheaper. This so-called “upgrade” is really just a swap to a more obscure, cheaper CPU.

Conclusion#

This supposedly “super-sized” EPYC experience turned out to be a super-sized disaster.

When something is cheap, someone has to pay for it — and that applies to both users and providers.

Plan Details#

  • Provider: Tarekcloud

  • Type/Plan: HongKong EPYC Super-Sized

  • Processor: AMD EPYC 7B13 64-Core Processor

  • Num of Core: 8 Cores

  • Memory: 48 GB

  • Storage: 4****00 GB NVMe

  • Bandwidth: 20000GB @ 3 Gbps IN | 3 Gbps OUT

  • Location: HK

Benchmarks#

Yabs#

Terminal window
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 9 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 7B13 64-Core Processor
CPU cores : 8 @ 2445.404 MHz
AES-NI : Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled
RAM : 47.0 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 393.6 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)
Kernel : 6.12.48+deb13-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Online
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Asia Pacific Network Information Center
ASN : Unknown
Host : Asia Pacific Network Information Center, Pty. Ltd
Location : South Brisbane, Queensland (QLD)
Country : Australia
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 285.45 MB/s (71.3k) | 1.09 GB/s (17.1k)
Write | 286.20 MB/s (71.5k) | 1.10 GB/s (17.2k)
Total | 571.66 MB/s (142.9k) | 2.20 GB/s (34.4k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.36 GB/s (2.6k) | 1.51 GB/s (1.4k)
Write | 1.44 GB/s (2.8k) | 1.61 GB/s (1.5k)
Total | 2.80 GB/s (5.4k) | 3.13 GB/s (3.0k)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1092
Multi Core | 7328
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23828323
YABS completed in 3 min 4 sec

IP Quality#

image-20251006102521674

image-20251006102530929

Network Quality#

image-20251006103637863

image-20251006103917360

PassMark PerformanceTest Linux#

image-20251006104324769

BGP#

image-20251006102436715

Tarekcloud EPYC Purchase Experience: Super-Sized Specs, Super-Sized Headaches
https://catcat.blog/en/tarekcloud-hk-epyc-benchmark.html
作者
猫猫博客
发布于
2025-10-06
许可协议
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0